Politics or Perfection?

"We Need to Talk About Kevin received no attention despite Tilda Swinton giving arguably her finest performance"

A look at this year’s questionable Oscars nominations.

It is around this time each year that people complain about the alleged ‘terrible’ Oscars nominees. 2012 has been no exception, with many outwardly disagreeing with the Academy’s choices. However, although it has been heralded as one of the worst years for cinema in a long time, it is undeniable that there have been films far superior to those nominated that haven’t received the recognition they duly deserve. This is not a new trend but a factor of the Academy Awards that has taken place since their inception in 1929.

The Oscars nomination process is one that clearly adheres to a number of set rules and principles. It is governed by a political process that means certain types of films can never make it to the short list and the same people can’t win on numerous occasions. It is arguable that were a director to jump through the hoops and make a film that ticks all the right boxes, they would have no problem garnering that much sought after Oscars nod. Being the most esteemed award to be offered to members of the film community, you would presume it should commend originality, artistic merit and exceptional acting skills, however, more often than not, those films that are placed in the limelight are simply safe choices that are average at best.

The top films of the previous year can be split into two main categories. The first illustrates a celebration of nostalgia, featuring allusions to the past and the supposed Golden Years of cinema. It is this category that has captured the hearts of the Academy and therefore landed this year’s Oscars nods. Hugo, which leads the pack with 11 nominations, is a commemoration of the work of George Méliès, much forgotten following his decline as a result of the first World War. Similarly, The Artist, which is just behind with 10 nominations, is a homage to the silent era and captures the devastating effect the advent of the talkies had on silent actors. Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris, with 4 nods, perhaps best encapsulates the ethos of this year’s nominations as it delightfully explores the disenchantment of one’s own era and longing to be part of artistic ages past.

The second group can be collated due to their unconventional intensity that often treads a fine line between gratuity and tastefulness. Perhaps due to the controversial nature of their content these films have been largely overlooked, despite featuring some of the best performances of the year. It is surprising that We Need to Talk About Kevin received no attention despite Tilda Swinton giving arguably her finest performance and an exquisite cinematography that blended the beautiful with the grotesque. Similarly, Michael Fassbender’s performance in Shame is flawless in its delivery, yet due to the tender subject of the film, never stood a chance.

In the Best Foreign Language Film category, Pedro Almodóvar’s The Skin I Live In received no recognition despite being one of the best films of the year, let alone one of the best foreign films. However, again due to the controversial nature of its content it is perhaps understandable that it was never considered.

Olivia Coleman’s turn in Tyrannosaur was a brutal portrayal of a woman trapped in an abusive marriage and yet she didn’t receive any notice. Ryan Gosling in the graphic Drive, Australia’s Snowtown, Britain’s Kill List. These were all brilliant films but never had a look in due to the constraints placed on what constitutes an ‘Oscar Worthy’ film.

There were, however, a number of surprising omissions that can’t be disregarded due to contentious content. Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who gained a Golden Globe nod for his part in 50/50 was nowhere to be seen, as was Charlize Theron for Young Adult. The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn, infinitely better than Kung Fu Panda 2 yet perhaps dismissed due to Spielberg’s numerous nominations for War Horse. Lars Von Trier’s Melancholia, most probably forgotten due to the excitement over the director’s ill advised Nazi comments.

So far it appears that the only awards ceremony that seem to have acknowledged the year’s truly best films is the London Critics’ Circle Awards. Unafraid to buck the trend, they heralded the real deserving films. It remains puzzling how films as trite as Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close or as emotionally manipulative as War Horse can be given any attention yet this seems to be the way of the Hollywood circle. One piece of advice: don’t go looking to the best picture nominees for a decent piece of cinema.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Jan 31st 2012.

A Walk to Remember

Photo Credit: Melanie Sangwine

On a cold January morning in Edinburgh, when most people are tucked up in bed, the sun begins to rise, illuminating the castle and gently melting the frost. Towards the esplanade, a small group huddled around one man begin a countdown.

As they reach zero, a faint cheer is heard and a bearded figure emerges wheeling a buggy piled high with equipment. The man’s name is James Thomas and he has just begun a walk from Edinburgh to New Zealand.

On a trip that will cover 12,500 miles, through 15 countries and take him two years to complete, he will be crossing hostile territories, Indonesian rainforests and the Australian desert to reach the antipodal point of Edinburgh, Dunedin. With no support team, he is carrying all the equipment he needs himself and intends to spend his long nights camping, couch surfing and staying with friends where possible.

Originally from West Cork in Ireland, Thomas has been living in Edinburgh for the last five years whilst studying film and photography at Edinburgh Napier University. Having graduated last year, he notes, “I was struggling to find work in film and photography so I decided to fulfil this thing I’ve always wanted to do.”

Aiming to walk 130 miles a week- a distance which equates to roughly five marathons- it is undeniable that this will be a very demanding challenge.

However, Thomas remains admirably optimistic, he comments, “I don’t think it is going to be too bad physically. There are people who do physical labour, working on building sites every day and doing much harder things than what I’m doing. I’m just walking.” Already a keen rambler, he has experience trekking in the Annapurna and a couple of months ago made the trip from Inverness to Fort William in preparation for his expedition.

Ultimately, this is not simply a personal endeavour but an effort to raise funds for children’s charity UNICEF. On choosing the organisation, he says, “It’s a very international challenge so I wanted to support an international charity. I wanted a charity that no matter where I went people knew what it was for.”

He has high hopes, with aims of raising £1,000,000 over the course of the trip. But, as he rightly points out, “If David Walliams can get it for swimming the channel, surely I can get it for walking around the world.”

The motivation behind his adventure appears ambiguous. “It changes every day. Most recent is I just turned 30 so I’m saying to myself this is the last chance I can go out and do something as I’m not getting any younger. I’ve always wanted to do this. Travelling to the antipodal point has always been the thing.”

With a keen desire to have something to show for himself, it is apparent that for Thomas this is a very personal ordeal. When asked how he thinks it will affect him as a person, he contemplates for a second before answering, “It is inevitable that it will change me somewhat but I don’t know yet whether it will change me for the better or for the worse.” As the interview draws to a close, we come to a stop and I thank him for his time, already glad that in a few minutes I will be inside and beginning to get warm after what was a bitterly cold morning. However, for Thomas, this is only the beginning, and as I bid him farewell, he turns and begins to walk the long road, alone.

For more information, or to sponsor James, you can visit his website here.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Jan 31st 2012.

Classic Cult: Silent

With The Artist already receiving huge critical acclaim despite the awards season having only just begun, it seems appropriate to look back at some of the most influential silent films that have recently received a surge of interest.

The early shorts that emerged during cinemas infancy are extraordinarily insightful, and, despite technical limitations, illustrate incredible ingenuity and artistic skill. Georges Méliès’ La Voyage dans la Lune which features the iconic image of a spaceship landing in the eye of the moon, was recently alluded to in Martin Scorsese’s Hugo and remains a must see for anyone with an interest in cinematic history. Spanish director Luis Buñuel’s surrealist film Un Chien Andalou is another short that has received cult status. Presenting a series of tenuous scenes that attempt to depict dream logic in narrative flow, its haunting representation of a woman’s eye being sliced in half has become famous.

Horror was a popular genre during the silent era and was dominated by German expressionist directors. Films such as F.W. Murnau’s Nosferatu, which remains a chilling cult classic, while Robert Wiene’s The Cabinet of Dr Caligari is stunning with its elaborate sets and dreamlike sequences. It has also been cited as the first film to introduce the ‘twist ending’.

Silent comedy is best known through the work of Buster Keaton and Charlie Chaplin. While The General is often cited as Keaton’s best film, it is exceeded by Sherlock Jr. in terms of impressive special effects and unconventionally humorous situations. Chaplin, known predominately for his endearing character ‘The Tramp’, created heart-rending comedy that is perhaps best realised in his film City Lights.

Fritz Lang’s Metropolis is the first true science-fiction masterpiece in film. Its exploration of the social crisis between workers and owners, through a dystopic vision that mirrors the capitalism of Marx and Engels, is both powerful and unforgettable. The precursor to all modern sci-fi, it returned to the public eye in 1984, when Giorgio Moroder released a restored version featuring a soundtrack from artists including Freddie Mercury, Jon Anderson and Adam Ant.

The best love story of the silent era has to be Murnau’s Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans. A poignant depiction of a married couple that looks at the fragile nature of human relationships, it offers a bit of everything, making it an outstanding piece of cinema.

Perhaps one of the most enduring scenes in silent film can be found in the dramatisation of the mutiny that took place on board the Russian battleship Potemkin in Sergei Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin. The massacre of civilians on the Odessa steps is as iconic as it is horrendous and is paid homage to in many modern classics.

However, the finest silent film of all time has to be Carl Theodor Dreyer’s The Passion of Joan of Arc. A depiction of the trial, imprisonment, torture and execution of Joan of Arc, its extreme close-ups featuring actors without make-up and incredible performance from Renée Jeanne Falconetti make it one of the most harrowing films of all time.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Jan 24th 2012.

Classic Cult: Christmas

Christmas is a time for family, fires and forgiveness, and no more is this apparent than in the films televised during December each year. Endless showings of Toy Story and Love Actually illustrates the public’s fundamental desire to see something light hearted and fun, whilst also managing to capture the Christmas spirit. However, for the cult enthusiast, there are a multitude of options which allows for alternative viewing, so long as you don’t rely on the TV guide to make it happen.

Regularly featuring on lists of worst films ever made, Santa Conquers the Martians (1964) is an alternative Christmas tale that sees Santa kidnapped so he can bring Christmas joy to the people of Mars. Featuring a young Pia Zadora and one of the most entertaining attempts at creating a polar bear in cinema, it remains a great cult classic. For fans of The Flaming Lips, Christmas on Mars (2008) is a definite must see. Written and directed by the band’s frontman Wayne Coyne, and featuring the entire band in the cast, this is arguably the most psychedelic science-fiction Christmas feature around. Containing an almost indecipherable plot and frequent bouts of superfluous colours and foetuses, Christmas on Mars epitomises cult cinema.

A Muppet Christmas Carol would be the obvious film from the Jim Henson Company to watch at this time of year, yet they boast a number of other great Christmas features. Most notable of these is made-for-TV movie The Christmas Toy (1986). In a world where toys play when people aren’t watching, but who are frozen forever if caught out of their normal place, Rugby the plucky tiger plush toy is on a mission to try and be this year’s Christmas present, so he can remain the favourite toy for another year. With more than a passing similarity to Toy Story, it is undoubtedly one of the best low-key Christmas family films. Babes in Toyland (1986) is another television film and features all the necessary elements for a top notch cult film: a young Drew Barrymore, Keanu Reeves, singing, nursery rhyme characters, a villain who lives in a bowling bowl and Pat Morita (aka Mr Miyagi) as the Toymaster. Despite being a relatively atrocious film, it remains entertaining nonetheless.

Horror is a genre which dominates cult Christmas films, from the slashers of the ’70s and ’80s to more recent attempts at bringing a scare factor to the festive season. Some of the classics include Black Christmas (1974), Christmas Evil (1980), Gremlins (1984), Santa’s Slay (2005) and Jack Frost (1997). However, Silent Night Deadly Night (1984) is one that particularly stands out. The development of the lead character, who becomes increasingly psychotic after witnessing the massacre of his parents, justifies it as one of the better horror Christmas classics.

Good cult Christmas films have been relatively sparse in recent years, however, Jalmari Helander’s Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale (2010) breaks the mould with its slick combination of comedy and horror. A tongue-in-cheek film that looks at the ‘secret’ behind Santa, it is an entertaining foray into the alternative Christmas story.

Remembered for its iconic line, “You’ll poke your eye out,” A Christmas Story (1983) is a coming of age story that rivals Home Alone. Following a nine-year-old boy named Ralphie, who despite the best efforts of everyone around him, does everything in his power to ensure he gets a Red Ryder BB Gun for Christmas. Watchable time and time again, it is one of the top cult comedies to see at this time of year.

Finally, no cult Christmas is complete without Scrooged (1988). It’s fantastic blend of horror and comedy, starring Bill Murray as a conceited, cynical TV executive, makes it the first stop for anyone looking for alternative Christmas viewing. There have been countless productions of A Christmas Carol but few are as original or entertaining as Richard Donner’s adaptation.

There is no need for anyone to watch endless re-runs of overplayed and clichéd films at this time of year. The alternative possibilities available will provide enough entertainment to far exceed the festive period. It simply remains a difficulty as to where the best place is to start.

An expanded version of an article first published in The Student, Tue Dec 6th 2011.

Best/Worst World Cinema DVD Releases 2011

Le Quattro Volte: "a poignant depiction of life and the interrelation of all things"

Best World Cinema Films 2011

 

  1. The Skin I Live In

As beautiful as it is grotesque, Pedro Almodóvar’s arthouse venture is a stunning look at the bizarre. With exquisite cinematography from José Luis Alcaine and original music by Alberto Iglesias, it continues to stir the imagination long after its credits role. Its haunting subject matter is approached with a surprising tenderness, to create a deeply disturbing tale that is aided by a fantastic performance from Antonio Banderas. Whilst it may be too shocking for some, it remains the most powerful film of the year.

  1. Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives

For anyone with even a passing interest in ghosts or the supernatural, Uncle Boonmee is a definite must see. Deeply enigmatic, it intersperses the extraordinary with the ordinary, to create a magical tale that is incredibly touching to watch. Containing themes encompassing dreams, memories and death, it provides a thought provoking look at the concept of extinction and mortality. Beautifully experimental, its enchanting nature establishes it as a worthy winner of the Palme d’Or.

  1. Le Quattro Volte

Michaelangelo Frammartino’s philosophical film is a poignant depiction of life and the interrelation of all things. Filmed with an incredibly subtle tone, it contains virtually no dialogue but still manages to have a strong effect on the viewer. This lack of speech emphasises the surrounding sounds of each scene which often go unnoticed in most films. Rich in symbolism, it leaves you contemplating your own existence and place within the universe.

Worst World Cinema Films 2011

 

  1. Ninja Girl

Unlike his previous film Alien Vs. Ninja, Seiji Chiba’s latest effort fails to hit the mark. For a martial arts film, it features very little in the way of actual fighting. With poor acting that isn’t helped by a weak script, it fails to draw the viewer in and instead falls flat like the films villains. With its convoluted plot and obtuse subject material, Ninja Girl is definitely one you won’t need to worry about missing.

  1. Norwegian Wood

Adapting Haruki Marukami’s work for the big screen was never going to be an easy task, even if Norwegian Wood is one of his less surreal books. Anh Hung Tran’s bold attempt to breathe life into the well loved author, though admirable, fails to impress. In particular, Rinko Kikuchi’s portrayal of Naoko comes across as irritating making the viewer unable to give her the empathy afforded her in the book. By no means a terrible film, it is let down by its inability to do justice to the original story.

  1. About Elly

Given the success of A Separation, which has made a considerable impact at this year’s film festivals, it is surprising that About Elly is unable to offer the same level of quality. With its unbelievable characters and uninspiring plot, it comes across more as tedious and boring than captivating. Demanding a considerable amount from its audience, the shock factor it strives for at the film’s turning point fails to be delivered. As a director, Asghar Farhadi has a lot to offer Iranian cinema, but sadly this film isn’t a fair representation of his skill.

Platige Image: Unappreciated Animation

Screenshot from Damian Nenow's Paths of Hate

Platige Image is an award-winning post-production studio founded in Warsaw, Poland in 1998. Specialising predominately in commercial production, they focus on creating advanced animation and quality special effects for films.

One of their more notable works includes Andrzej Wajda’s Oscar-nominated film Katyn, for which they did the special effects. Telling the story of the 1940 Katyn massacre, in which Polish citizens and prisoner of war officer’s were ordered by Soviet authorities to be mass executed, Platige were responsible for retouching over 160 scenes, which entailed around fifteen minutes of film footage.

Recently, the studio has done a considerable amount of editing on the films of Lars von Trier. At the beginning of 2009, they began working on over eighty takes for von Trier’s Antichrist. This project, led by Jakub Knapik, proved to be a great challenge, as they were working directly with von Trier who was incredibly meticulous about each individual detail of production. Often unhappy with the way the team had edited a scene, it became a long and laborious process, but one whose success is clearly evident in the film’s captivating images. Not only this, but the effects they were working on were far removed from the explosions and very in-your-face style predominant in Hollywood, instead focusing on an unusual blend of subtlety and horror. The influence their work had on the final version of Antichrist is considerable.

Read more…

Taken from SubtitledOnline, published online Wed Dec 7th 2011.

Scotland: the new Hollywood?

Illustration Credit: Tamsin Scott

Scotland has always had a minimal role in the film world. Ever remembered for BraveheartTrainspotting and Sean Connery’s sexy accent, it seems incredibly far removed from the showbiz of Hollywood. Yet it appeared that one of the recurring themes at this year’s BAFTA Scotland Awards was the question of the country’s new-found importance in the film industry. Finally, it seems to be getting the due recognition it deserves, with an increased interest in both its locations and actors being apparent.

First to grace Scottish soil was Brad Pitt, whose upcoming post-apocalyptic zombie horror, World War Z used Glasgow’s George Square because of its similarities with the streets of Philadelphia. This in turn led to a sudden flurry of interest, as Scotland became a legitimate location for filmmaking. Subsequently, it has seen a transformation into the streets of San Francisco for the film version of the book Cloud Atlas, starring Halle Berry;  the setting for a body-harvesting alien who abducts hitchhikers, in Scarlett Johansson’s forthcoming, Under the Skin; and  for elements of the final instalment of Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy.

This newfound attraction seems to have received a warm welcome from members of the Scottish entertainment industry, as James Cosmo – winner of the Best Actor in Film Award at this year’s Scottish Bafta’s for his film Donkeys - commented, “It’s great to see films shot in Scotland and we wish there would be more shot.” Similarly Peter Capaldi, who was nominated for Best Actor in Television for his role in Field of Blood stated, “Scotland always punches above its weight in terms of filmmaking and television.”Hollywood regular Robbie Coltrane, who won an accolade for Outstanding Contribution to Film at the awards said, “It’s a wonderful thing, and why not? It’s a great location and the problem has always been Scotland’s weather, but now we have HD cameras that can film in candle light. You don’t need California sunshine to make films any more. I think it’s going to open up Britain and Scotland in particular.”

In an industry that now turns over £1.2 billion in profit, it is clear that the Hollywood invasion is potentially worth millions for small companies. Evidently an incentive is needed to encourage production companies to come to Scotland, thus removing the competition from neighbouring countries. Proposals of fiscal incentives such as a five percent return on the money spent in the UK, will help provide the necessary allure for big name American production companies to consider Scotland a viable option. Somewhat depressingly, it was predominately due to cash incentives that quintessentially Scottish film Braveheartwas actually filmed in Ireland.

According to Belle Doyle, locations manager for Creative Scotland, the recent insurgence of Hollywood films that have come to Scotland was never properly planned. “It was luck. It was down to people getting the money on time, the weakness of the UK pound, the producers getting the money and all the films arriving at once. The fact that Glasgow is a gridded city helps a lot. We are competing with the rest of the world, so we are always having to think about what we can sell and how we can bring something in and make it look as good as they could get in the States and everywhere else.” As she rightly points out, when put alongside the production companies of Hollywood, they don’t stand a chance. “We look like we are amateurs. What I can offer are world class crews, fantastic locations and people that are really keen. There are definitely talented people here but we are a kind of cottage industry at the moment.”

Unfortunately, in a lot of cases production companies are unwilling to fund film projects. Film producers inevitably go wherever the money is, and when it comes to financing a film, you have to look at where the best place to reduce costs is. Offers of tax breaks in certain countries play a huge factor in a producer’s decision to use a certain location.

For Scottish films themselves, there seems to be a definite perception that they tend to all be grim and depressing. As Scottish screenwriter Sergio Casci points out, “what we expect from Scottish films is either shooting up or shooting grouse.” Whilst this is true to a certain extent, there are countless examples of top quality comedies, horrors and sci-fi films that have simply slipped under the radar.Film is an industry that is governed by Hollywood. Whilst other countries work hard to achieve the same level of viewers, budget restraints inevitably result in considerably less profit being achieved at the box office. As award winning British indie director Ken Loach comments,“We need to reclaim our cinemas because at the moment they show almost exclusively films from another culture. American films are fine but they shouldn’t dominate to the extent they do”.This is a fundamental sentiment that needs to be addressed. However, given the recent success of Scottish actors – with Robbie Coltrane and Billy Connolly featuring in the upcoming Disney Pixar feature Brave, and Peter Mullan playing Albert Narracott’s father in Spielberg’s adaptation of Warhorse – perhaps a focus should be maintained on the collaboration of Hollywood and Scotland, rather than their mutual exclusivity.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Nov 29th 2011.

Africa in Motion

Now in its sixth year, Africa in Motion returns to the Filmhouse with a programme that promises to deliver a wide variety of African cinema. A largely volunteer based festival, it seeks to introduce the breadth of films Africa has to offer that sadly goes relatively unnoticed in the UK. As a result of under-representation, it is rare that any films made in Africa ever make it outside the continent – even in the more independent cinemas – so AIM offers a unique opportunity for members of the public to enjoy this diverse form of cinema. African film-makers telling their own stories illustrates a deviation from Hollywood interpretations, which gives insight into the real lives of the African people and the challenges they face on a day to day basis.

As Isabel Moura Mendes, one of the Festival’s managers, commented, “It’s very difficult for African film-makers to fund their own films and even harder for these films to have a decent distribution strategy which would allow them to show the film or run the festival circuit.” However, she was quick to note that this lack of distribution has nothing to do with the overall quality of the productions. “It is not a reflection of the quality of the films but a reflection of how the industry is organised and how much money has been invested in the different aspects of producing a film.”

Focusing this year on the theme of childhood and youth in Africa, it features a range of films which explore many aspects relating to youth, such as education, stories and myths, entertainment, the future and social issues. Looking at both urban and rural areas, AIM represents films that are for, by and about children and young people. As Mendes said, “These are ideas which resonate with people all over the world regardless of where they are. We wanted to look at how young African nations and their young communities face these challenges and learn from them, as we can learn from different cultures and the way they deal with their own challenges.”

Screening a number of films, especially for primary and secondary schools around Edinburgh, a definite attempt has been made to create an engagement between young people and African film. This combined with a variety of dancing and drumming workshops make AIM both an informative and family friendly festival.

The festival features three UK premieres: Notre Étrangère (The Place in Between) explores issues of belonging, identity and the relationship between a mother and a daughter set in the West African country of Burkina Faso; Moroccan film Pegase (Pegasus), which won the Best Film at FESPACO,  is a surreal coming-of-age drama that is told through flashbacks and dreamscapes; and the closing film Un Pas en Avant, les Dessous de la Corruption (One Step Forward: The Inside of Corruption) which deals with corruption and politics in Africa in a humorous fashion and also won the FESPACO award for Best Actor.

It is clear that AIM offers an original opportunity to enjoy a rare glimpse of African cinema. As the UK’s largest film festival to focus on productions coming purely out of Africa, for anyone interested in gaining an insight into this diverse continent, it is not be missed.

Africa in Motion is running events around Edinburgh from 2nd-6th Nov.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Nov 1st 2011.

The Birth of Horror…

In recent years horror has become the subject of taboo; a genre that has increasingly tested the limits of acceptability and enjoyment. As films become ever more violent and grotesque, it is arguable that something fundamental has been lost in a much loved and artistic form of cinema. The pioneers of this lucrative art form are regularly cited in top film lists, creating box office hits that have shaped the history of cinema. So, what has changed to make this a genre that is no longer taken seriously?

The first horror films focused predominately on the ideas and characters established in the Gothic literature of the nineteenth century. Initially depicted in shorts, such as Georges Méliès’ 1896  Le Manoir du Diable, that sought to amuse through pantomime, feature length horror films weren’t produced until the 1920s. A field dominated by German expressionism, films such as Robert Wiene’s The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari went on to influence directors such as Orson Welles and Tim Burton, whilst F.W. Murnau’s Nosferatu marked the first vampire-themed feature.

Hollywood didn’t make an impact until the second half of the 1920s when the first horror star Lon Chaney gained precedence. Known as the man of 1000 faces, he famously did his own makeup- creating grotesque and deeply disturbing characters. Films such as The Phantom of the Opera (1925), with its classic shocking reveal, were as much a case of evil spectacle as a claustrophobic horror picture.

The 1930s brought the arrival of sound with Tod Browning’s Dracula (1931) being the first horror to be a box office hit. Actors such as the Hungarian Béla Lugosi and British Boris Karloff  became overnight stars after years of minimal success in Hollywood. Frankenstein (1931),  which starred Karloff as the monster, illustrated a being that was initially childlike and gentle, only later being guided into violence.

Creating empathy for a horrible creation allowed horror to become a fantastically interesting genre. Rouben Mamoulian’s 1931 production of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde showcased a dazzling single-shot transformation sequence. Heightened by a subjective camera that enabled the viewer to experience the change through Jekyll’s eyes, it was achieved through rotating a filter on the camera which revealed layers of different coloured makeup. It was this sequence that helped its star Frederic March receive the best actor Oscar in 1932.

It was Warner Brothers who broke away from the Gothic tradition, bringing horror into a contemporary setting. James Whales’ Old Dark House (1932) illustrated the first use of an isolated residence visited by strangers seeking shelter, opening up a Pandora’s box of nightmarish events. At the same time, Browning’s 1932 tale of sexual manipulation and revenge, Freaks, blurred the line between reality and fiction. Starring actual carnival performers, many of whom had physical deformities, it bombed at the box office due to its shocking and controversial content (which resulted in a 30 year ban in the UK). Since then, however, it has made a huge comeback and become something of a cult phenomenon.

The 1940s brought producers such as RKO’s Val Lewton into the limelight. Although restricted by a low budget, his 1942 film Cat People terrified audiences by proving that less can be more. For the first time in horror history, monsters didn’t have to be seen, just suggested. This slow build up to a sudden non-threatening jolt became known as a ‘Lewton Bus’ and is an integral feature of modern horror.

However, by the end of the 1940s, horror had become virtually extinct, and was to remain so until the mid-1950s and the birth of Hammer Films in the UK. This period also saw the rise of British horror star Christopher Lee, who at 6ft 5in retains a very demanding presence. Evidently, horror had taken a new direction, but proved that it was anything but dead.

In subsequent years it was to see the arrival of visionary greats such as George Romero, Alfred Hitchcock’s exciting turn to horror, and the birth of slasher cinema. It is undoubted that in their own right they are brilliant films, but are arguably indebted to techniques pioneered decades earlier. In a somewhat unfortunate turn of events, most people now associate horror with either the current cult phenomenon of budget B-list films, or with later greats such as The Exorcist (1973), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) and Halloween (1978). However, it was films in the first half of the twentieth century that set the standard. Unappreciated and, to many, unknown, it’s the perfect place to start if you are looking for something fun to do on Halloween.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Oct 25th 2011.

The Mental Health Issue

Eddie Harrison: “I don’t think it would have expanded like this unless it fulfilled a public need"

Mental health is not something foreign to film, but has been explored by countless directors and screenwriters since the inception of cinema. From memory loss to dementia, it makes up a large percentage of what we view on screen. Now in its fifth year, the Scottish Mental Health Arts and Film Festival encourages people to actively engage in discussing and thinking about mental health issues.

Through its varied programme, comprising film, theatre, music, literature, comedy and visual art, it aims to create an accessible setting in which participants can comfortably explore very real problems.

Originating simply as a weekend of films which dealt interestingly or appropriately with mental health issues, it set out to illustrate that many of today’s productions approach the idea of mental health from a bad perspective. Slasher movies like Halloween, or thrillers that use some kind of mental issue as a shorthand for megalomania, are a far cry from the reality of coping with mental health issues. The SMHAFF attempts to de-stigmatise mental health in such a way, as people often associate it with illness.

According to Eddie Harrison – the director behind the film part of the festival – “It started off as a perceived need or opportunity for something which dealt specifically with mental health issues. It was an original idea and not an imitation of something which was being done in another country.”

As he rightly points out, “Everyone has mental health, it is not just something that happens to a very small group of people necessarily. Everybody has issues one way or the other.”

On the face of it, one could argue that every film is about mental health. Harrison seems keen to emphasise this as he challenges, “Show me a film where the main character doesn’t go through some kind of mental stress.” It is when film is approached in this light that you can begin to realise that every plot can be seen to address some kind of mental health issue, although naturally, some do it better than others.

With over 250 events across Scotland covering a variety of different art forms, Harrison is right when he notes, “I don’t think it would have expanded like this unless it fulfilled a public need or was something that needed to be responded to by people.” He also stresses that there is no hierarchy of one event over another. They all share an equality, whether it be a small key performance in a hospital or a gig put on by a well known artist.

Harrison has curated the program along with Dr Peter Byrne, who is a psychiatrist and senior lecturer at University College London. Byrne is an expert on mental health in the movies and so by working with Harrison – whose experience lies in film criticism and making – the pair have managed to compile a varied selection of films.

The fascinating thing about the SMHAFF is that people come along to the screenings not with an interest to talk to the filmmakers – they are not there – but to talk about the issues which the films explore. As Harrison says, “If you put on a film that gets an emotional response from an audience, it helps to open them up and attracts people who maybe want to talk about the issues behind it.”

Ever expanding, the festival has had something of an international effect, with other countries imitating or taking example from it. Its awards have gained critical acclaim, garnering attendees who come from far and wide. The reason for its success seems obvious, as Harrison concludes: “Film is a fantastically accessible thing and can open up subjects which people wouldn’t take if it was handed to them in a didactic way. Mental issues are a growing thing; there are a lot more people on anti-depressants. There is a general concern about how people can deal with their mental health. The key thing in the festival is that it raises people’s awareness of it. By doing something like this and getting it out there and having people publicly talking about mental health, I think it removes the stigma and challenges people’s perception of mental health.”

The Scottish Mental Health Arts and Film Festival is showcasing events across Scotland until October 24th.

Taken from The Student, published Tue Oct 18th 2011.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 75 other followers